Quantcast

Strong showing at DEC's Lafarge hearing

Community members and leaders urge DEC to move project ahead

27 people on Thursday, Jan. 20, provided the state Department of Environmental Conservation with comments about a proposed modernization of the Lafarge cement plant in Ravena, the overwhelming majority of which were positive.

That was a change for the cement maker, which has been the subject of several recent public meetings on the health impact of the plant on the surrounding community. On Thursday night, even the most outspoken of Lafarge's critics voiced their general support for the massive overhaul, which the company promises would reduce emissions and increase efficiency.

We have been waiting for this evening for years, said Susan Falzon, director of the Friends of Hudson advocacy group. "We are generally supportive of the idea of the modernization."

Falzon and others still raised concerns about the plan, including a provision that would require air quality monitoring at the Ravena-Coeymans-Selkirk High School " across the street from the plan " for one year. Falzon and others said that monitoring should continue for longer.

Questions about dealing with dust emanating from the plant were also raised, with some saying an effort should be made to better insulate conveyor belts that carry limestone and cement through the community.

"The question is not whether or not to modernize, the question is whether the plans submitted by Lafarge are truly state of the art," said Elyse Kunz, of the local Community Advocates for Safe Emissions group. "We have got to get it right."

CASE, Friends of Hudson and the Scenic Hudson groups said they're conducting a detailed review of the lengthy environmental impact statement, and would providing more detailed written comments.

Approval of the document would be a major regulatory milestone for the project.

Lafarge has long been working towards approval of the overhaul, which would replace the "wet kiln" now used with a "dry kiln" process. The company has said this would use significantly less energy and limestone (the raw material used in the cement-making process). Some of the plant's emissions would also be reduced, including the output of mercury.

0
Vote on this Story by clicking on the Icon

Comments

Use the comment form below to begin a discussion about this content.

Sign in to comment